I've almost closed bug #106. I've done all I can do for now, until I can figure out how to attribute actions to senators. Until then, I should comment out the 'actions' tab tomorrow with a note letting whoever tries this next what I've already tried. There is still some work to do in this code, particularly with fixing the hacky Assembly scraping I wrote last year which also broke. However, considering that the Assembly is not currently one of the bits we are trying to expose (and they don't have a nice public API like the Senate), it probably won't get done for a little while. When I left yesterday, I had exposed the senator's social page, but none of the other tabs were showing up. The problem for this turned out to be that the image representing the tab was corrupted and the text beneath it was white, making it overall look like the tab was invisible. Once I got a new image for the tab, they all suddenly appeared, though only the bills had any information. The next thing to fix was the scraping of the committees, whose pages had also changed subtly in the past few months. Fixing this was much less annoying than building them the first time, and I was able to remove a lot of old shims in the code from when I was first being introduced to BeautifulSoup. Some of my later changes made this particularly easy, and since BeautifulSoup is so powerful, I was able to restore access to the data with relative ease. As a bonus, as soon as I had committees back up, the tabs for votes and meetings came with it for free. Suddenly, I was almost there! The final problem I encountered today is actually not a new one, but one we struggled with last year, and one I now feel confident I have actually fixed and understand now. Once I got all the data pulling again, a few of the pages would crash the server with UnicodeDecodeErrors. As a warning, some heavy Python is about to come down UnicodeDecodeError is an error which happens (generally) when attempting to decode a string into a Unicode object. This is generally a great thing to do, as Python strings are generally encoded in the relatively restrictive ASCII, which does not have characters for any of the more exciting characters like accents and non-latin symbols. Unicode has no such restrictions, and indeed has data for many, many more symbols, at the cost of a few more bits of storage per character. So why were we getting this error? The relevant line of code was 's = unicode(s)' and was contained within WebOb code, not something I was going to be able to modify successfully. Still, even this shouldn't be a problem. The purpose of this function is to turn strings to Unicode strings. Except I didn't have a string, I already had a Unicode string. Even this shouldn't be a problem, except that unicode() tries to interpret its input as a string and then turn it into a Unicode string. And while Unicode strings can be easily represented as normal strings, the default of the unicode() function is to try to interpret those strings as ASCII strings, and I had accents in the strings. These strings were representing the names of the senators, so I had to make sure it came out right. In order to solve this, I had to reversibly represent these names as a sequence of ASCII characters. There are a few ways to replace out-of-bound characters when changing strings into lesser encodings, and I had two useful ones to chose from. The obvious one to chose was to change the characters into XML character entities, however this quickly turned out to be insufficient. While é correctly showed up as é on the page, this string is used to represent the name everywhere, including in the internal URL representing the page. And the ampersand was quickly stripped out as a broken argument to the URL, leading to a page for a nonexistent Senator. Looking through the code, there were three distinct uses for the name string. The first, which had started all this, was as an ASCII key to a dictionary which needed to be authoritative but not necessarily accurate. In other words, I needed it to be the same everywhere, but it didn't necessarily need to be the correct name of the senator. The second was the use on the generated web page, which needed to be as accurate as possible to the Senator's actual name, as it is going to be viewed publicly. The third, and the current stickler was the name in the URL. Again, this had to be authoritative but not necessarily accurate. This one, however, had to also only include web-safe characters, of which &, # and ; do not qualify. I mulled this over for a while, thinking up more and more elaborate schemes for intercepting the names before they reached critical areas, but none of it was terribly good coding practice. After far too much thinking, I realized the obvious answer: have separate internal and external names. The system still relies on the senator's name, which is still a questionable practice given the multiple spellings of names that occasionally pop up, (but mostly because I remember this post, which is something you should always keep in mind when programming around names. The display name, on the other hand, has none of the restrictions on characters (though it still needs to be ASCII to display properly), but by using XML entities, we can make any character we want without problems. This was a long path to take to get back to where we were, but I think that I really understand Python's Unicode in a way I never grasped before. This should definitely help in the future as Unicode is a very important part of coding portable applications and that's something I want to do.