Deploying MediaGoblin 1: FastCGI vs uWSGI

Last week I did a thing I really wasn't expecting to. I deployed MediaGoblin to FOSS@RIT's yacht server here. The initial setup and instructions are some of the clearest and straightforward I have seen in an open-source project.

There are several reasons I haven't written this up earlier. One of the reasons was the web server configuration file was more complex than I was used to, so in order to get the server running quickly, I made a new config file for port 8080. Unfortunately, due to various arcane networking policies, while this allowed anyone inside RIT to access the server, it was still not available to the outside world.

Also, though the instructions were very clear, they used a few things I had not used before, and a few things that weren't used in the way I was used to them. This is the first blog post on the subject, detailing my confusion with FastCGI and its eventual replacement with uWSGI.

What the flup?

MediaGoblin, as documented, uses FastCGI to route requests from the web server to MediaGoblin. The CGI in FastCGI refers to the 'Common Gateway Interface', a standard developed to allow web servers to act as 'gateways' to serve not just files but the output of executable programs. The MediaGoblin docs describe how to use a python module called flup to enable this communication.

There's a bit more to it than that, but in Python land, this turns out to be a more questionable prospect than it might seem. Python already has its own gateway interface (called the web server gateway interface, or WSGI) which it is using to talk to FastCGI to have the WSGI turned into CGI so that it can be interpreted by the server and turned into a web page. This would be fine except that there are other WSGI-specific modules which can translate the WSGI into a web page directly.

At this point, I assume that you are either skipping ahead past things you already know or are horribly lost, so I'll just say that I eventually moved MediaGoblin from the paste->flup->FastCGI->nginx contraption it was to a more comprehensible uWSGI->nginx, and this is how I did it.

Enter uWSGI

First, I changed the nginx config to talk to uWSGI instead of FastCGI. As I was also trying to move MediaGoblin to a subdirectory, I also added the uWSGI_modifier1 line and altered SCRIPT_NAME accordingly:

# Load MediaGoblin via uWSGI
location /mediagoblin/ {
   include uWSGI_params;

   # our understanding vs nginx's handling of script_name vs
   # path_info don't match :)
   uWSGI_param SCRIPT_NAME "/mediagoblin";
   uWSGI_modifier1 30;

Second, I altered the file to accommodate being run with uWSGI. This is a bit complicated as,, and are all actually the same file, with certain things changing depending on the name by which it is invoked. I changed two sections [1], first:

case "$selfname" in


case "$selfname" in

And then near the very end of the file:

case "$selfname" in
        $starter serve "$ini_file" "$@" --reload


case "$selfname" in
        $starter --plugin python --virtualenv . --ini-paste "$ini_file" "$@"

This method allows you to keep using all the information on how to run MediaGoblin from paste.ini, while using uWSGI to do all the heavy lifting. The socket still needs to be defined with the command, though, with ./ --socket or whatever socket you are using.

As a side note, this also allows us to use your system's uWSGI emperor to manage bringing up the uWSGI process for you. If you are running celery as a separate process, this still needs to be done somehow, but otherwise (or if you've kept CELERY_ALWAYS_EAGER=true), then MediaGoblin should be managed automatically. This is the format I eventually settled upon, using the following uWSGI ini file:


What Next?

As far as I can tell, this should have been all we needed to get running. Well, this wouldn't have been necessary either, except for some of the repercussions of the other big problem that reared it's head, SELinux.

But that is another post.

[1]This statement is not entirely accurate. I actually made a new link named and added the sections instead of altering the existing ones. This format was chosen for clarity.

Similar posts to this one